







Art Historian - Research
GRAEME CAMERONArtists researched & lost works rediscovered/restituted
Leonardo da Vinci-Michelangelo Buonarroti-Giorgioni-Raphael Sanzio-Sandro Botticelli-Palma Vecchio-Tintoretto-A del Sarto
Parmigianino-Hans Holbein the Elder-Hans Holbein the Younger-Albrecht Durer-Guercino-G Reni-G.B.Foggini-Girolamo Carracci
Giovanna Garzoni-Artemesia Gentileschi-Mary Beale-Carlo Dolci-Johannes Vermeer-Rembrandt van Rijn-Jan Lievens-M Sweerts
Gerard Dou-Peter Paul Rubens-Anthony van Dyck-Frans Hals-J Both-K Djardin-Van Goyen-G Poussin-P Lely-G Kneller-J M Wright
Joseph Wright-Chardin-JM Nattier-F Boucher-Vigee Lebrun-JB Greuze-G Courbet-F Goya-D Martinez-W Hogarth-Thomas Gainsborough-Joshua Reynolds-JMW Turner-John Constable-Thomas Moran-J E Millais-Dante G Rossetti-ECBurne-Jones-Lord Leighton-Poynter-James Whistler-Claude Monet-Gustave Caillebotte-Edgar Degas-M Cassatt-Vincent van Gogh-Paul Gauguin-Sickert
​
Applied Art Historical, Connoisseurship & Technical Research leading to the rediscovery of lost and misattributed masterpieces by
the greatest masters of Art History; also revealing new knowledge of their unknown working practices and lives, with the
ultimate purpose of restituting their Masterpieces for the benefit of the artist's legacy and posterity.






Research into the actual identity of Leonardo's Lady's Portrait at the Louvre Paris presently claimed as "Mona Lisa" below after Gallery Shots

NEWS & EVENTS

Recent research of the "Young Mona Lisa" portrait revealed the same much older 60+ woman who was was originally painted and is now on Sub surface of the "Mona Lisa" painting now in the Louvre, also exists on the Sub surface of this recently proclaimed "Leonardo" portrait of the same woman, in the "Younger" version.
This further corroborates the above previous research that both these paintings were earlier created around 1493 in Leonardo's Studio in Milan, and that this old woman is almost certainly the 63 year old "Caterina", Leonardo's mother, who also lived in Milan at that time. Whereas the original panel portrait, now at the Louvre was painted by Leonardo and later "rejuvenated" in Florence circa 1503, to the more youthful 30 year old
seen at the Louvre today. This "Second version" on canvas was most probably painted at the same time
by Leonardo's companion "Salai", as the style of this original Sub surface portrait matches his traits and inferior rendering method, as demonstrated by the comparitive image of one of his other portraits Below.
As with Leonardo's original, this "version" of this same
60+ year old woman was also rejuvenated, probably in Florence around 1504,to an even younger 20 year old. However whether that was accomplished by Leonardo himself, or one of his best pupils, is the question to be decided, as the final "Surface image" we see today is
more profoundly renderered than Salai was capable of, as an example of Salai's distinctive work below proves.
Irrespective, this new research rewrites traditonal always unproven speculation as to her actual identity, and definitively confirms Leonardo's portrait of Lisa Giocondo is another portrait, now lost, whose whereabouts still remain unknown, but "Lisa" is quite certainly not the sitter seen in either of these portraits.
NEW RESEARCH REVEALS
THE SAME 60+ WOMAN
EXISTS ON SUB SURFACE
OF BOTH "MONA LISA"
& "YOUNG MONA LISA"


Not having actually examined the final "rejuvenated" surface image "insitu", seen today on this painting, this researcher would withold any judgement of opinion regarding its possible authorship, and whether or not the hand of Leonardo or one
of his best pupils was responsible for it. However, despite other conflicting opinions on this painting's evolution and authorship, all made without the new research knowledge outlined herein; the woman featured obviously cannot be the young
23 year old "Lisa Gherardini, wife of the Florentine Silk Merchant del Giocondo", as it is clearly the "rejuvenated image" of the same originally rather haggard, informal, 60+ aged woman, & therefore most probably "Caterina", the beloved mother of Leonardo.
Likewise the very basic, "naive background" also indicates Salai's authorship, as does the quite noticeable "androgenous" appearance of the Old Lady's face and her less accurately depicted, wider spaced eyes and longer nose. These anatomical faults all caused her later "Rejuvenation" to exhibit different "Spatial Variations" within the Facial features, when compared with those of Leonardo's original of old "Caterina".


Jan van Kessel's beautiful 17thC Dutch Still Life




Preview Sections
of rediscovered Masterpieces by Rembrandt
van Rijn from his early Leiden years to his later period

Rembrandt'sSelf Portrait of 1652
Portrait of the Dutch Reform Preacher Johannes Ellison of 1634
Amsterdam





Portrait of a Lady of the Uylenburgh Family possibly Saskia or her older Sister Hiskje, her Guardian.at this time Circa 1633.
The same Lady's C.1633 preparatory Study & Rembrandt's Self portrait also appears on an X-ray of the Subsurface of his
"Old Man in a High Hat"
This unique situation indicates she obviously had much closer ties to Rembrandt than the usual portrait sitter.
The early Years
View of the outskirts of Leiden
Circa 1629

Direct Comparison
with Rembrandt's Portrait of his Sister



Rembrandt's Self portrait Circa 1632 (Left) Copy (Right)
Rembrandt's Mother
Neeltje C.1628 also 1640


Portrait of Queen Henrietta
Maria in The Hague of 1642
e
Portrait of Flemish Artist
Anthony van Dyck C.1632

Further Dutch "Golden Age" rediscoveries include Frans Hals 1635 "Trader in Oriental Dress, also Rembrandt's engraved "Old Man in a High Hat" Circa 1633 with both Rembrandt's Self portrait and(Saskia or Hiskje's) Portrait on its Subsurface.


Rembrandt's C.1633 "Old Man in a High Hat."
Gerard Dou - Rembrandt's best Pupil


Preview of the central section of Gerrit Dou's discovered 1672 "The Old Scholmaster". Dou was Rembrandt's most successful pupil joining the Studio before 1630, but painted in the most meticulous manner, unlike Rembrandt who used a far bolder, impasto style, especially as he grew older. Despite his master's great achievements and stellar reputation, Dou was actually more successful in the late 17thC, and paradoxically whilst Rembrandt died in poverty
in an unmarked, unknown, grave, Dou was to earn huge sums from Royalty for his exquisite "cabinet" paintings like
this example. His works are today becomming far more appreciated, but he would never eclipse Rembrandt's brilliance

Section of Guercino's rediscovered "Ecce Homo"


Exceptionally rare c.1815 Regency Grand Sideboard
